BTW, There is a lot of talk of Israeli businesses boycotting Turkey. A number of clothes shops have removed goods from its shelves. The Jerusalem Post reported that Rami Levi supermarket chain has started a Turkey boycott as well. Personally speaking, I don't think it will affect me. Turkey has always given me inflammation in my feet. Chicken may be more expensive but it’s a lot tastier.
"The frustrated attempts by activists to sail boats like the Rachel Corrie to Gaza has thrown the spotlight on life inside the territory under Israel's blockade, as the BBC's Jon Donnison reports from Gaza City.
At the Gaza City port, dotted with small fishing boats, a young Hamas policeman dressed in black and with a Kalashnikov tucked under his arm, lent over and smiled.
"Are the Israelis going to let the ship the Rachel Corrie come?" he asked.
I told him it was unlikely. He offered me a resigned look, sucking through his nicotine-stained teeth."
Sounds as if Jon Donnison is practicing his writing skills for the next fictional TV drama production. Do they still have "Play of the Week" on British Television?
The whole piece falls apart however when you introduce some facts.
Israeli media is reporting that Hamas is preventing all the goods brought by the flotilla from entering the Gaza Strip via the land crossing with Israel. They said that if it hasn't come from the sea then they don't want it. Meanwhile, the goods are piling up in Tzrifin army warehouse.
This is surely a major news item which exposes the humanitarian disaster in Gaza as a complete hoax yet no one outside Israel is reporting it. Why?
Melanie Phillips shows photos of the markets in Gaza, packed with food and luxuries on her blog.
Meanwhile, bloggers around the world (such as lgf) are reporting that Reuters news Agency, who supply many of the photos to Western media have doctored the photos of the IDF soldiers being tortured by the Turkish "peace activists". They digitally removed much of the blood and in one case, removed the knife from one of the terrorist's hands.
Now why would they do that? If the major News Agency falsifies documents in such a blatant way, don't you think it deserves a few comments on your TV news or on the Internet pages of BBC, CNN, SKY etc?
YNET is reporting that Turkey's Hurriyet newspaper today published photos of the Turkish terrorists on board the Mavi Marmara ship beating IDF soldiers to a pulp.
The newspaper makes the idiotic statement that the IDF tried to censor these photos because they did not want to loose face but that "Turkish technology" managed to extract the photos from wiped memory cards.
Their statement reveals their innate Arab way of thinking despite trying to convince the world how European they are. Just like Arabs, they are primarily concerned with honour and they stupidly try and project this primitive way of thinking onto Israel.
The Turkish paper is so busy boasting, that they haven't even stopped to realise that they are actually confirming Israel's version that those on board were Jihadi thugs and ironically implying that their own government, who called the passengers peace activists, are liars!
The Jerusalem Post is reporting this morning that the IDF recorded radio messages sent from the Turkish Gaza flotilla to the Israeli navy which contained chilling anti-Semitic language.
The JP gives two examples:
“Shut up. Go back to Auschwitz,” a male voice said in reply. The message was broadcast to the navy from one of the ships, the IDF confirmed on Saturday.
“We’re helping the Arabs go against the US. Don’t forget 9/11, guys”
The problem is that the IDF only decided to reveal these recordings last Friday when it released them to teh press. The JP reports that the IDF placed the recording on its web site but I've spent some 10 minutes looking for it and cannot find it!
Why did it take the IDF so long to release these recordings? It's simply too late. Had they released these to the world a few hours after the event it may well have had a significant impact on the world's media's perception of who these "peace activists" really were. Now, its old news. The world has concluded that Israel committed murder and moved on to the next story. To coin a phrase. Last week's Internet news is today's virtual fish and chips paper.
Excuse the pun but the IDF have missed the boat! Today, the UN as well as the British government are screaming for an international enquiry in order to publically lynch Israel.
Compare this to Caroline Glick's "We Con The World" music video parody which they produced from beginning to end in a couple of days. YouTube shows a million views already with 20,000 comments. Not bad for a bunch of "Amerikayim".
I might post later on today but for now I need to quickly clean this ketchup off my screen and get on with some regular work.
The Flotilla Choir sings "We Con The World"
Hoping it goes viral.
YouTube has caved into pressure by Arabs and removed the video under the pretence that it breaks copyright law. Caroline Glick of The Jerusalem Post said that she had consulted with legal experts before the making and they assured her that it was 100% legal. However that's the story YouTube are sticking to.
As a result of this, many have uploaded copies of the video onto YouTube so it can be viewed again.
Doing a search of "we con the world" brought up this one:
Sometimes we Israelis think we are cleverer then everyone else and can ignore standard and proven procedures. The Israel Navy was forced to ignore standard practice carried out by all other Navies in dealing with boats trying to break through a blockade. They should have disabled the engines of these boats and then waited until the crews arranged their own voluntary evacuation.
According to many articles such as this on the YNET site "Predictable Israeli fiasco", it was reported that, on the direct orders of Ehud Barak, the Navy was told to evacuate the ships by non violent means only. Barak placed the IDF soldiers in an impossible situation. They were completely unprepared for what happened. It was a complete failure in intelligence (both the miltary and Barak's). Barak has caused a worldwide public disaster. Only time will tell what damage to the State this has caused. He has handed a propaganda gift on a silver platter to Hamas and all the hostile world media. Will Barak now resign? Will he be fired?
So, armed with paint ball guns of all things, the soldiers slid down a rope, one by one (the BBC described this as hundreds of troops "storming" the ships!), only to be beaten to within inches of their lives as soon as they set foot on the deck. Turkish TV edited out most of the beatings and made it look like it was an unprovoked attack against peace activists. The IDF however did not bring out their video clearly showing what actually happened until today, giving the terrorists free reign in the world media to spew out their lies for a whole day.
The BBC falsely reported yesterday that the Turkish passengers were peace activists and quoted the leader, a Ms Berlin as saying that they were unarmed and had put up only passive resistance but the IDF came in with guns blazing and murdered the passengers. The BBC however made the mistake of showing a video clip that clearly shows an IDF soldier being beaten by at least two men with clubs. When they realise their mistake, I'm sure they'll quickly edit that out.
The BBC website reports today about the IDF video (see below):
"The BBC's Wyre Davies describes how the Israeli army has released a video which it claims shows the violence on board as it boarded the flotilla. "
What does the BBC mean by saying that the IDF "claim" it shows violence? Why does Wyre Davies have to decscribe the release of the video? The video is primary evidence and clearly shows what happened. There is no ambiguity about it.
Surprisingly, The Daily Telegraph site is worse than the BBC in its reporting using classic pro-Islamic terrorist propaganda techniques. (See here). What the terrorist "peace" activists say is reported as facts where as anything Israel says are just allegations and claims!
"[Israeli] Government ministers defended the actions of its troops fiercely after the pre-dawn raid, alleging they had come under attack from violent forces allied to Hamas, Islamic Jihad and al-Qaeda. "
"Two of the dead activists had fired at soldiers with pistols, the army also claimed."
But supporters across the world condemned the attack on a "peaceful mission".
"The Free Gaza Movement, one of the organisers of the flotilla, said the IDF had started the violence, firing as soon as they boarded the ship."
Here is a snapshot of one of these peace activists, taken just before the IDF arrived:
The knife was recovered by the IDF and appears again along with other peaceful items in an IDF photo below.
The British government's reaction to this? It is to reward terrorism!
William Hague, the foreign secretary said: "I call on the Government of Israel to open the crossings to allow unfettered access for aid to Gaza".
In other words, he is telling Israel that Her Majesty's government believes that Jewish lives are valueless and that Israel has no right to defend its own citizens by restricting produce which Hamas are using to produce weapons.
But as these photos show, these Turkish terrorists were prepared for a fight with molotov coctails, metal bars, clubs, knives and guns.
A letter from a friend, please forward Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 7:56 PM Subject: What happened on the coast of Gaza?
I am disgusted and dismayed. Not by the actions of the Israeli Navy, but by the silence (so far) of our leaders who are supposed to explain to the world what is going on.
The information below comes from my son who serves in the Navy and has just arrived home from Ashdod.
We realized that the flotilla of ships trying to reach Gaza was a provocation. No one realized how heavily they were armed.
Five of the ships were boarded by the naval commando in the early hours of this morning and surrendered without resistance. The ships were taken to Ashdod, and the food they were carrying will be sent to Gaza, which as we know receives daily supplies of food, electricity and other essentials from the “Zionist entity” it refuses to recognize.
When the commando boarded the sixth ship, the Marmara, they faced armed resistance. The gunmen – many of whom were clearly prepared to be “shahidin” , martyrs – jumped on them in an organized lynch and started to stab them and beat them with clubs, knives and metal poles. After they grabbed one of our soldiers and threw him overboard, and started shooting the other soldiers with his rifle, they had no alternative but to open fire to protect themselves. In such a situation, it is surprising there were so few casualties. About ten IDF soldiers were injured, some seriously. My son will start his day tomorrow visiting one of them, a former schoolmate, at Tel Hashomer hospital , before returning to Ashdod.
If any proof were needed of the “peaceful” intentions of the passengers of the ships, or at least this one, we received a very clear picture.
Please pass this on to whoever might be willing to listen to the truth!
Kol hakavod (kudos) to our soldiers and refuah shelemah (a speedy recovery) to the wounded.
Baroness Jenny Tonge has crossed the thin line of acceptable criticism of Israel and into pure and simple anti-Semitism many times before. It seems that even the Liberal democrats have some moral standards left or perhaps it’s simply a case of being embarrassed by this hateful nasty woman's outrageous comments once too many times, that she has finally been fired.
I am not being cynical without due justification. The Liberal Democrat Leader, Mr Nick Clegg, while giving Tonge the boot, insisted that he did not believe her to be anti-Semitic or racist! Was he being tongue in cheek? I think not. The only other explanation therefore must be that she simply embarrassed the party too much. A case of Tonge putting foot in mouth causing egg on face too many times.
''Following discussions with the Leader of the Liberal Democrats in the House of Lords, Lord McNally, I have decided that Jenny Tonge will stand down as Liberal Democrat health spokesperson in the Lords following her unacceptable comments suggesting an inquiry into highly offensive allegations against the IDF humanitarian operation in Haiti,'' Mr Clegg said.
''The comments were wrong, distasteful and provocative and I recognise the deep and understandable distress they have caused to the Jewish community.
''While I do not believe that Jenny Tonge is anti-semitic or racist, I regard her comments as wholly unacceptable. Jenny Tonge apologises unreservedly for the offence she has caused.''...
As far as the Israeli Haiti Rescue Team is concerned; after being accused by Tonge's forked tongue of organ stealing and getting the boot, the shoe is now on the other foot. I suppose she will claim that there was in fact proof of body parts stealing but that Israel has since got rid of the evidence. A clear case of not wanting to speak to the accused organ grinder and being all too willing to listen to the monkey if you ask me.
Still now, after her booting, rather than getting cold feet, she will be free to express her anti-Semitism fully, having been kicked back upstairs to the House of Lords.
I am waiting for the demands for a House of Lords inquiry as to whether the human ears that we Jews use to make our Purim Chumantashen came from Iran, the traditional export country, or from Haiti? I must admit that this year's chocolate flavoured brown "oznei Haman" ("Haman's ear" as we call them in Israel) found in the shops do look rather suspicious!
Iranian or Haitian ears?
It would finally show the justification for the world's (read British) outrage against Israel, especially after last year's scandal where imported Xtian baby blood from Scandinavia, used to bake the matzos for Pesach broke EU's food and additives standards regulations.
There has only been one other scandel to my memory, even remotely similer and that was way back in 1969 involving real crunchy frogs. See here for old news real on YouTube.
"My name is Superintendent Parrot and I are from the hygiene squad.We want to have a word with you about your box of chocolates entitled the Whizzo Quality Assortment..."
The New York Times must have been in a real panic having to face the possibility of reporting something positive about Israel but of course our own Israel's loony-left comes to their rescue. They give the newspaper enough fodder to feel justified in proclaiming:
"For Israelis, Mixed Feelings on Aid Effort"
Israel feels a mixture of pride and deep shame apparently over Haiti. How so?
The article comments:
“Many commentators argued that the work in Haiti was a reflection of a central Jewish value. Michael Freund, a columnist in The Jerusalem Post, wrote on Thursday, “Though a vast gulf separates Israel from Haiti, with more than 10,500 kilometers of ocean lying between us, the Jewish people demonstrated that their extended hand can bridge any gap and traverse any chasm when it comes to saving lives.”
But on the same page, another commentator, Larry Derfner, argued that while Israel’s field hospital in Haiti is a reflection of something deep in the nation’s character, “so is everything that’s summed up in the name of ‘Gaza.’ ” He wrote: “It’s the Haiti side of Israel that makes the Gaza side so inexpressibly tragic. And more and more, the Haiti part of the national character has been dwarfed by the Gaza part.”
Early in the week, Akiva Eldar, a leftist commentator and reporter with the newspaper Haaretz, made a similar point: “The remarkable identification with the victims of the terrible tragedy in distant Haiti only underscores the indifference to the ongoing suffering of the people of Gaza.”
Read the full article here if your stomach can take it:
Akiva Eldar is a paid up member of the loony-left. To give you an example of just how left leaning this guy is, he still supports the failed Oslo agreement. He is considered left-wing even by Haaretz standards and this is the person The New York Times chose to quote.
As for Larry Derfner. Anyone who regularly reads The Jerusalem Post knows that good old Larry is their court jester. His weekly piece is entitled "Rattling the cage" and there is a big question as to whether he actually believes all the crazy nutty things he writes. He is probably simply playing devil's advocate in order to invoke angry feedback comments and get people foaming at the mouth. Just a quick look at the comments on the article quoted in The New York Times and you'll get the picture.
The talkbacks point out the obvious which is that it's obscene to compare innocent Haitians trapped under rubble to Palestinian terrorists trapped in tunnels and bunkers, designed and built to murder Israelis.
It shows the desperate position that The New York Times found them selves in, having to resort to quoting Larry.
The bottom line is that the reporting that Israel is bemoaning the fact that they did not help the poor Palestinians is a figment of the imagination of the loony-left and an outright lie to report it as fact.
I'm not sure which is worse; the total silence of the BBC or the outright lies of The New York Times. Comments anyone?
First of all a big "hat tip" to fellow frum ex-Brit blogger Living and Writing in Israel for her latest post entitled "Rolls Royce of Field Hospitals". It's a great piece about the Israel Field Hospital in Haiti. As she says, it’s a tremendous Kiddush Hashem. Please see her media links. One was to a Daily Telegraph blog by American writer Stephanie Gutman which was hilariously tongue-in-cheek. This fact however seems to have escaped many of the Brit's talkbacks who somehow took her seriously. Perhaps this is a case of American humour going over the British heads rather than the other way round for a change.
Also a must read is Melanie Phillips' excellent blog post in The Spectator entitled "A disproportionate response?" I suggest you read the whole piece but I couldn't help copying and pasting her closing statement:
“Israel sent a team of 220 aid workers. Israel has a population of six million. The population of Britain is 60 million. I’d say that was a disproportionate Israeli response, wouldn’t you?”
They say that pictures are worth a 1000 words. These are the results from a search of +"israeli field hospital" +haiti on the CNN News site:
13 results, all of which feature prominently Israel's incredible rescue efforts in Haiti.
And now let's do the same search on the BBC News site, "The No.1 most respected, most comprehensive and most believed News site in the world" .
One entry! Actually it's no entries because looking in that entry you find that it's not even a news article! It’s a collection of short eye-witness reports from Haiti. Two of the eye-witnesses mention the Israeli's presence. Apart from that, Israel's rescue team is "Judenfrei" from Auntie Beeb's site. We've known for a long time that the BBC has an automatic pro-Israel news filter with the radio button permanently set to "Block". With all the world’s media reporting on the IDF’s field hospital in Haiti, is there any other explanation besides an editorial policy of anti-Semitism, for this astonishing news blackout at the BBC?
I'll finish with a wonderful quote from one of Melanie Phillips' talkback comments (I assume also tongue-in-cheek?. At least I hope so):
British airlines and security companies have invited Israeli security consultants from ElAl to speak about their profiling techniques even though the British will probably not be able to carry the techniques out. This is despite the fact that these methods have been proven to be the most effective way to prevent attacks and save lives.
British security will take a jar of hand lotion from an 80 year old grandma, force the mother to drink the contents of her baby's bottle, confiscate a see through green plastic gun from a 4 year old and insist that everyone take off their shoes because some nutter once used his shoes to hide an explosive device.
Israel Airport security however doesn't do any of these things. People, not items, carry out terrorist attacks and that's why Israel profiles people and not plastic toy guns. In Britain this policy would fall foul of the PC (Politically Correct) idiots.
Even if they see a suspicious person they cannot directly pick him or her out for special treatment because of accusations of racial profiling. All British Security forces can do is wait until he or she slips up. It's like waiting for a miracle from heaven.
Looking up the initials PC in an English Dictionary prior to 1977 and you'd find that PC meant "Police Constable". When I was growing up, I learnt that there ought to be a PC (Camberwick Green /Dixon of Dock Green style) on every corner to tell you the time, rescue kittens from trees and help lost children. Dictionaries after 1977 were more likely to define PC as "Personal Computer". Today in Britain you will find one of these on each street corner rather than a Bobby. Now the definition has changed again. PC means not to give offence to criminals and terrorists even though it tramples on everyone else's basic right to safety.
Israeli Security asks some basic questions to determine if you are who you appear to be. Religious Jews are asked basic questions on Judaism. This could be a problem for the average Reform Rabbi from the UK being asked about questions on kashrut or about this week's parsha but they aren't looking so much at the answers but how you react to the questions. A non-Jewish single friend of mine came to Israel for my Chasuna . He was immediately identified as an interesting subject and given closer attention. He was asked questions about me, such as where I lived and he found that he simply couldn't answer them. They started searching his bag and then discovered the Birkon from the wedding with my name on it in Hebrew. He had taken it from his table not actually knowing what it was but thought that it was a nice souvenir. This Birkon saved him from further suspicion and he was allowed to board the plane. Interestingly enough he told me later how much safer he felt on the plane knowing that Security was so thorough.
Returning to the invitation to speak in Britain, even though British Security personal may not be able to carry out all the techniques that the Israelis employ, they still thought it more than worthwhile inviting Israeli consultants to come to Britain and speak but unfortunately the Israel Foreign Ministry has advised these consultants to stay home. Why? Because many of these Security experts are also reserve officers in the IDF and there are British solicitors (with very Jewish sounding names incidentally) working for Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists who stand waiting at the airport with arrest warrants to put these Israelis on trial on accusations of international war crimes.
Britain "2010" is a sick place. British law prevents its citizens the basic right to safety while at the same time aiding and abetting terrorist organisations to imprison members of the IDF. Should we really take these threats of arrest seriously? I think so, considering the British are not even willing to stand up for their own troops I doubt that our soldiers will fare better. A few months ago I saw scenes of British Muslims cursing and jostling British soldiers as they arrived at Luton airport from Iraq. I wonder why Israeli Arabs don't do that here in Israel? The answer is that they'd be attacked by the general public. In Britain however, the PC brainwashed crowd looked on in silence. Shame on them for not standing up for those who put their lives on the line in the defence of values they ought to hold dear in Britain but unfortunately take for granted.
We in Israel appreciate our brave soldiers. May Hashem bless them and protect them. Amen.
The general public often buy Pizza for Tzahal (IDF). Just a small "thank you".
On Chanuka, people stopped to give soldiers Sufganiyot (doughnuts).